Topic 11.7

Does Respiration Reduce Crop Yields?

James N. Siedow, Duke University, North Carolina, USA; Ian M. Møller, Royal Veterinary and Agricultural Univeristy, Denmark; Allan G. Rasmusson, Lund University, Sweden

Plant respiration can consume an appreciable amount of the carbon fixed each day during photosynthesis over and above the losses due to photorespiration (see textbook, Chapter 8). To what extent can changes in a plant′s respiratory metabolism affect crop yields?

Attempts to establish a quantitative relationship between respiratory energy metabolism and the various processes going on in the cell have led to a break-up of respiration into two components (Lambers 1985). In growth respiration, reduced carbon is processed to bring about the addition of new biomass. The other component, maintenance respiration, is needed to keep existing, mature cells in a viable state. Utilization of energy by maintenance respiration is not well understood, but estimates indicate that it can represent more than 50% of the total respiratory flux.

Although numerous questions remain regarding these issues, there are several empirical examples of relations between plant respiration rates and crop yield. In the forage crop, perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne), yield increases of 10% to 20% were correlated with a 20% decrease in the leaf respiration rate (Wilson and Jones 1982). Similar correlations have been found for other plants, including corn (Zea mays) and tall fescue (Festaca arundinacea) (Lambers 1985). However, later investigations have shown that "selection for low rates of mature leaf respiration is not an appropriate method to select for high-yielding cultivars in perennial grasses" (Kraus and Lambers 2001).

Although there is a potential for increasing crop yield through reduction of respiration rates, a better understanding of the sites and mechanisms that control plant respiration is needed before such changes can be exploited commercially in a systematic fashion by plant physiologists, geneticists, and molecular biologists (Loomis and Amthor 1999). Furthermore, much remains to be learned about the general applicability of such observations and the conditions under which slower-respiring lines could be at a disadvantage, causing a reduction in crop yields rather than an increase.

Two recent studies illustrate the present difficulty of predicting the effect of directed changes at the molecular level on plant productivity:

Nunes-Nesi et al. (2005) found that the productivity of transgenic tomato plants with a reduced activity of mitochondrial malate dehydrogenase was increased as compared to the wild type. Although the respiratory activity of mitochondria isolated from the transgenic plants was unchanged or higher than in the wild type, the rate of leaf respiration was reduced in the transgenic plants. Photosynthesis was markedly increased in the transgenic lines, possibly linked to increased levels of ascorbate.

Sieger et al. (2005) studied the effect of the alternative oxidase on the growth of tobacco cell cultures. Considering the energy-wasteful nature of the alternative oxidase (see Web Topic 11.3) one might expect that a cell line lacking the enzyme would grow faster than the wild type. Secondly, alternative oxidase has a role in the response of plants to oxidative stress (see Web Topic 11.3 and Web Essay 11.5), so a cell line lacking the alternative oxidase would also be expected to handle abiotic stress less well. The results were surprising—the transgenic cell line with a very low expression of alternative oxidase grew as fast as the wild-type cells under normal, nutrient-sufficient conditions, and faster than the wild type under conditions of macronutrient limitation (low phosphate or low nitrogen). It appears that the alternative oxidase is an important factor in modulating the growth rate in response to nutrient availability.

Plant respiration involves an intricate metabolic network of interacting pathways and a complex regulation of gene expression and enzymatic activities. We clearly need to know much more about these interactions before we can predict the effects of changing the expression of single genes on plant productivity.

References

Kraus, E., and Lambers, H. (2001) Leaf and root respiration of Lolium perenne populations selected for contrasting leaf respiration rates are affected by intra- and interpopulation interactions. Plant and Soil 231: 267–274.

Lambers, H. (1985) Respiration in intact plants and tissues: Its regulation and dependence on environmental factors, metabolism and invaded organisms. In Higher Plant Cell Respiration (Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology, new series, vol. 18), R. Douce and D. A. Day, eds., Springer, Berlin, pp. 418–473.

Loomis, R. S., and Amthor, J. S. (1999) Yield potential, plant assimilatory capacity, and metabolic efficiencies. Crop Science 39: 1584–1596.

Nunes-Nesi, A., Carrari, F., Lytovchenko, A., Smith, A. M. O., Loureiro, M. E., Ratcliffe, R. G., Sweetlove, L. J., and Fernie, A. R. (2005) Enhanced photosynthetic performance and growth as a consequence of decreasing mitochondrial malate dehydrogenase activity in transgenic tomato plants. Plant Physiol. 137: 611–622.

Sieger, S. M., Kristensen, B. K., Robson, C. A., Amirsadeghi, S., Eng, E., Abdel-Mesih, A., Møller, I. M., and Vanlerberghe, G. C. (2005) The role of alternative oxidase in modulating carbon use efficiency and growth during macronutrient stress in tobacco cells. J. Exp. Bot. 56: 1499–1515.

Wilson, D., and Jones, J. G. (1982) Effect of selection for dark respiration rate of mature leaves on crop yields of Lolium perenne cv. S23. Ann. Bot. 49: 313–320.