HOME :: CHAPTER 19 :: Essay 19.3 |
PREVIOUS :: NEXT |
Essay 19.3
Phototropism: From Photoperception to Auxin-Dependent Changes in Gene Expression
Emmanuel Liscum, Division of Biological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia.
September, 2002
Phototropism—the directional curvature of organs in response to lateral differences in light intensity and/or quality—represents one of the most rapid and visually obvious responses of plants to changes in their light environment (Liscum, 2002). Although a number of plant organs appear to be responsive to directional UV-A/blue light (Iino, 1990; Koller, 1990), most studies have focused on the positive phototropic response (bending towards the actinic light) observed in seedling stems (Figure 1). In nature, stem phototropism likely provides plants with an effective means for maximizing photosynthetic light capture and thus may have appreciable adaptive significance (Iino, 1990; Liscum and Stowe-Evans, 2000). Any adaptive advantage provided by phototropic responses are likely to be particularly important during the early stages of growth and establishment of seedlings (Iino, 1990; Liscum, 2002) and during gap filling situations in dense canopy conditions (Ballare, 1999).
At the physiological level, phototropism can be distinguished from other light-modulated directional growth responses such as nastic (Satter and Galston, 1981) and circadian-regulated (McClung, 2001) leaf movements by two major criteria: (1) directionality of response and (2) cellular basis of the growth response. With respect to directionality, phototropic curvatures are oriented relative to the direction of the incident light, while nastic and circadian-regulated movements are not. Changes in cell elongation rates across the bending organ drive the development of phototropic curvatures (Baskin et al., 1985; Briggs and Baskin, 1988; Orbovic and Poff, 1993), while reversible swelling/shrinking of pulvinar cells is prerequisite for many leaf movement responses (Hart, 1988; Koller, 1990). As will be discussed later, the changes in elongation rates that mediate phototropism appear to be established through an integrated response as cells respond to a lateral gradient of auxin across the organ (lowest on the lit side, highest on the shaded side) formed as a result of the directional light stimulation (Went and Thimann, 1937; Iino, 1990; Liscum and Stowe-Evans, 2000).
This essay will address our current molecular understanding of the phototropic response, with a particular focus on components for which genetic evidence of function exists. Discussion will also be limited to signal-response components mediating the basal UV-A/blue light-induced phototropic response in seedlings. Pathways that modulate responsiveness to directional UV-A/blue light, such as the phytochrome-dependent enhancement of phototropism, will not be discussed here. For information about these modulatory pathways the reader should consult a more comprehensive review by the author recently published in The Arabidopsis Book (Liscum, 2002). Because this latter free web-based text resource is updated on a regular basis, the reviews presented therein are both the most current and thorough.
Perception of Directional Light Cues
Phototropism has been the subject of study for more than 120 years (Darwin, 1880; Sachs, 1887), however the identity of the photoreceptor(s) mediating this UV-A/blue light response remained elusive for most of this period. Much of the recent century has even seen often heated debate about the identity of the chromophore (light absorbing co-factor) utilized by the phototropic receptor(s)—flavin versus carotenoid (Liscum, 2002). Mutational studies in Arabidopsis during the last decade led to the identification of a pair of related flavin-based photoreceptor proteins, the phototropins, that mediate the perception of phototropic stimuli, finally putting to end the long search (Briggs et al., 2001a; Christie and Briggs, 2001; Briggs and Christie, 2002). The following sub-sections describe the identification and biochemical characterization of the phototropins as they relate to phototropism.
Phototropin 1 (phot1)
Historically the first significant progress towards the biochemical identification of a phototropic receptor came in 1988 when Gallagher and colleagues reported a blue-light-activated phosphorylation of a plasma membrane-localized protein in etiolated pea seedlings. A number of subsequent studies examined the photophysiological properties of this light-dependent phosphorylation reaction in a variety of species (most notably maize, oat, pea, and Arabidopsis) and associated it with the phototropic response. For example, phosphorylation reactions: occur in the most phototropically sensitive tissues; are strongest in the tissue closest to the light and decreases in strength moving away from the lit side; are fast enough to precede the development of curvature; its action spectrum matches that for phototropism; and shows similar dark-recovery kinetics as phototropism after a saturating irradiation (Short and Briggs, 1994; Briggs and Huala, 1999; Briggs and Christie, 2002).
The first genetic connection between the phosphorylation reaction and phototropism came when Reymond and colleagues (1992) showed that a phototropic mutant of Arabidopsis, strain JK224 (Khurana and Poff, 1989), exhibited little, if any, blue light-induced phosphorylation. Interestingly, strain JK224 was independently proposed, based solely upon the photophysiological properties of the mutant, to harbor a lesion in a low-fluence rate phototropic photoreceptor (Khurana and Poff, 1989; Konjevic et al., 1992). Liscum and Briggs found that null mutations in the NONPHOTOTROPIC HYPOCOTYL 1 (NPH1) locus, of which JK224 is an allele (nph1-2), lack the target protein for the blue light-dependent phosphorylation reaction, and thus proposed that the NPH1 locus encodes the apoprotein for a phototropic receptor capable of blue light-induced autophosphorylation (Liscum and Briggs, 1995).
When the NPH1 gene was isolated by positional cloning it was found to encode a protein containing the 11 signature domains of Ser/Thr protein kinases (Figure 2A) and of the proper size to be the substrate for an autophosphorylation reaction (Huala et al., 1997). Although primary sequence analyses yielded nothing obvious that indicated inherent photoreceptor activity for NPH1, a repeated amino-terminal sequence motif was identified that exhibited homology to a subfamily of PAS domains found in sensor-proteins regulated by light, oxygen, or voltage (Huala et al., 1997; Zhulin and Taylor, 1997; Taylor and Zhulin, 1999). These PAS-like domains of NPH1, designated LOV1 and LOV2 (for their relationship to light, oxygen, and voltage-regulated PAS domains; see Figure 2A), were each subsequently shown to bind one FMN molecule (Christie et al., 1998). Soluble nph1 holoprotein (NPH1 apoprotein with associated FMN cofactors) isolated from a heterologous baculovirus/insect cell expression system was shown to exhibit blue light-dependent autophosphorylation with kinetic, fluence-response, and action spectrum characteristics essentially like those obtained with native Arabidopsis nph1, and for phototropism itself (Christie et al., 1998). Various solution spectroscopic methods, as well as x-ray crystallographic studies, have been used to demonstrate that the kinase domain of nph1 is likely activated in response to a conformational change(s) associated with a light-driven, but dark-reversible, covalent bond formation between a conserved Cys within the LOV domain and the FMN chromophore (Salomon et al., 2000, 2001; Crosson and Moffat, 2001, 2002; Swartz et al., 2001, 2002). The nph1 holoprotein has been given the trivial name, phototropin 1 (phot1), in order to reflect its physiological and biochemical properties (Christie et al., 1999; see Briggs et al., 2001b for gene and protein nomenclatures).
|
| Figure 2 Domain structures of the phototropin, NPH3 and RPT2 proteins. (A) Phototropin 1 and 2. LOV1 and LOV2 (blue regions) represent the flavin mononucleotide chromophore-binding domains (Christie et al., 1999). Both receptors contain a function serine/theornine protein kinase domain (red region) within their carboxyl-terminus (Huala et al., 1997). (B) Domain structures for members of the NPH3/RPT2 protein family. The DIa, DIb, DII, DIII, and DIV regions (black bars) represent areas of sequence conservation among members of the NPH3/RPT2 protein family. The BTB/POZ (red region) and coiled-coil (blue region) domains represent structurally conserved motifs. While not all members of the family contain all of these domains (see www.biosci.missouri.edu/liscum/nph3-rpt2figs.html), each domain is present in both NPH3 and RPT2 (Motchoulski and Liscum, 1999; Sakai et al., 2000). Inter-domain regions (grey) while not sequence conserved, exhibit moderate structural similarities from member to member (see www.biosci.missouri.edu/liscum/nph3-rpt2figs.html). (Click image to enlarge.) |
Phototropin 2 (phot2): a second phototropic receptor that functions redundantly with phot1 under high fluence rate conditions
While phot1 mutants clearly lack hypocotyl and root phototropism under low fluence rate blue light (e.g., < 1 µmol m–2 s–1), Sakai and colleagues (2000) reported that the phot1-101 allele retains a phototropic response at higher fluence rates—one essentially like wild-type at 100 µmol m–2 s–1. This finding, confirmed by studies of the phot1-5 null mutant exposed to directional light under greenhouse conditions (T. Campbell and E. Liscum, unpublished), indicated the function of a second phototropic receptor under high light conditions. The most obvious candidate for a second phototropic receptor apoprotein was the sole PHOT1 paralog PHOT2 (Jarillo et al., 1998; The Arabidopsis Genome Initiative, 2000; Briggs et al., 2001b). Although the PHOT2 apoprotein is slightly smaller than PHOT1 (110 kD versus 124 kD), sequence, and structural motifs are highly conserved. In particular, PHOT2, like PHOT1, contains a Ser/Thr protein kinase domain in its carboxyl terminal region and two LOV domains in its amino terminal half (Jarillo et al., 1998; Figure 2A). Moreover, the basic photochemical properties of baculovirus/insect cell-expressed phot2 holoprotein are similar to those of phot1 (Sakai et al., 2001), suggesting that phot2 likely functions as a blue-light receptor by a mechanism analogous to that of phot1.
While no alterations in phototropic responsiveness have been observed in phot2 single mutants (Sakai et al., 2000; Jarillo et al., 2001; Sakai et al., 2001), phot1 phot2 double mutants fail to exhibit seedling phototropic responses at both low and high fluence rates (Sakai et al., 2001). The fact that phot2 single mutants retain a phototropic response indistinguishable from wild-type under all fluence rates tested (Jarillo et al., 2001; Sakai et al., 2001) while the phot1 phot2 double mutant is essentially blind (Sakai et al., 2001), demonstrates that phot1 functions to some extent under all fluence rate conditions, while phot2 has redundant function for phot1 specifically under high fluence rate conditions.
How can we explain the overlapping, yet distinct, functions of the phot1 and phot2 receptors in the perception of phototropic stimuli? While there are no definitive answers to this question there are several pieces of data that suggest biochemical and molecular bases for this observation. First, while etiolated Arabidopsis seedlings do not exhibit acute light-dependent changes in PHOT1 mRNA abundance (Harmer et al., 2000; J. M. Christie, K. Sakamoto, and W. R. Briggs, personal communication), PHOT2 mRNA levels increase upon exposure to UV-A, blue, red, or white light (Jarillo et al., 2001; Sakai et al., 2001). Most interestingly, PHOT2 message levels increase more than two-fold at fluence rates of blue light (≥ 10 µmol m–2 s–1) where the redundant function of phot2 is most obvious (Sakai et al., 2001). Second, there are quite dramatic differences in the photocycling properties of the Cys-FMN bond formed within the LOV domains of phot1 and phot2 (Kasahara et al., 2002). In particular, there are differences between phot1 and phot2 in both the quantum efficiencies and dark-recovery kinetics for the formation of this covalent linkage, suggesting that much higher fluences are required to drive phot2 to the same photoequilibrium established under lower fluences for phot1. Like the expression differences, these differing photochemical properties suggest that phot2 is likely to have similar physiological properties to phot1 (e.g., have redundant phototropic function) under relatively high light intensities.
What's the role of phototropin kinase activity in phototropic signal-response?
Given that both phototropins are light-activated Ser/Thr protein kinases (Christie et al., 1998; Sakai et al., 2001) it is quite reasonable to hypothesize that phototropic signal transduction might involve phot1 and phot2-activated phosphorelays (Fankhauser and Chory, 1998; Briggs and Huala, 1999; Liscum and Stowe-Evans, 2000; Briggs and Olney, 2001; Christie and Briggs, 2001; Liscum, 2002). Yet to date, no protein kinases or phosphatases have been shown to associate with the phototropins. The only known kinase substrates for the phototropins are the phototropins themselves (Christie et al., 1998; Sakai et al., 2001). While the role of phototropin autophosphorylation is not currently understood, it appears not to be required for the induction of phototropism since phototropism is 2–3 orders more sensitive to blue light than the autophosphorylation response (Palmer et al., 1993; Salomon et al., 1997; Christie et al., 1998).
If phototropin autophosphorylation is not an inductive signal, what is its function in phototropism? Given that the "dark-state," or light-sensitive state, of the phototropins is the unphosphorylated form (Christie et al., 1998; Sakai et al., 2001), autophosphorylation may be a cue for desensitization of the receptors (Liscum, 2002). Sensor adaptation, where the receptor is desensitized after an initial perception event and then is "reset" so that future signals can be utilized as a signal, is a common, if not essential, feature of photosensory biology (Galland, 1989, 1991). In Arabidopsis, phototropic desensitization occurs (Janoudi and Poff, 1991, 1993) but without reducing the sensitivity (i.e., increasing the fluence threshold) of the response (Janoudi and Poff, 1991). Thus, sensor adaptation, as classically defined (Galland, 1989, 1991), is apparently not operating in Arabidopsis phototropism. However, it is plausible that the phototropic desensitization observed in Arabidopsis reflects desensitization of a "receptor complex" rather than the receptor per se (Liscum and Stowe-Evans, 2000; Liscum, 2002). As discussed in the following section, blue light-dependent autophosphorylation of phot1 may lead to dissociation of a complex containing phot1 and NPH3, a putative scaffold/adapter protein (Motchoulski and Liscum, 1999).
Signal-response Components Acting Downstream of the Phototropins
NPH3 and RPT2: phot1- and phot2-interacting proteins that scaffold phototropin signaling complexes?
Mutations in two Arabidopsis genes have been described that apparently disrupt the function of proteins acting early in phot1 and phot2 phototropic signaling pathways. First, loss-of-function nph3 mutations appear to disrupt phot1 signaling since they decrease phototropic responses of etiolated seedlings specifically under low fluence rate conditions (Liscum and Briggs, 1996; Motchoulski and Liscum, 1999), without altering blue light-induced autophosphorylation of phot1 (Liscum and Briggs, 1995). In contrast, the loss-of-function rpt2 (mutant designation, root phototropism 2) mutant retains nearly normal phototropism in response to unilateral low fluence rate blue light, but exhibits decreasing response with increasing fluence rates (Okada and Shimura, 1992; Sakai et al., 2000). While the phototropic phenotypes of rpt2 are essentially complementary to those of the nph3 mutants, they exhibit a fluence rate dependence that mirrors the apparent range of fluence rates under which phot2 functions (Sakai et al., 2000, 2001). The congruence between RPT2 and phot2 is also observed at the level of transcript abundance. Specifically, the RPT2 and PHOT2 transcripts are barely detectable in etiolated seedlings but increase in abundance in response to light with a similar fluence and wavelength dependencies (Sakai et al., 2000, 2001). Together with the mutant phenotype, this result suggests that RPT2 functions in a phot2-specific signaling pathway (Liscum, 2002).
When the NPH3 and RPT2 genes were isolated by map-based cloning approaches they were found to encode members of the same family of novel plant-specific proteins (Motchoulski and Liscum, 1999; Sakai et al., 2000; also see www.biosci.missouri.edu/liscum/NPH3-RPT2family.html). Primary sequence conservation between members of the NPH3/RPT2 family is found in five discrete, positionally conserved, regions designated DIa, DIb, DII, DIII, and DIV (Figure 2B). DIV contains a consensus Tyr phosphorylation site ([RK]-x(2,3)-[DE]-x(2,3)-Y; Patschinsky et al., 1982) that is conserved in 29 of the 32 members of the family, including NPH3 and RPT2 (Motchoulski and Liscum, 1999; E. Liscum, unpublished). Although it is not known whether phosphorylation can occur on the conserved Tyr of NPH3 or RPT2, it is interesting to note that the nph3-2 allele, which phenotypically indistinguishable from a null mutant (nph3-6) that contains a stop codon at the Trp2 position, carries in an in-frame deletion of this Tyr residue (Motchoulski and Liscum, 1999). NPH3 and RPT2 also contain multiple potential Ser and Thr phosphorylation sites, further raising the possibility that reversible phosphorylation may be important for their function (Motchoulski and Liscum, 1999; Sakai et al., 2000).
In addition to displaying modular sequence conservation, members of the NPH3/RPT2 family exhibit modular structural features that are positionally conserved (although sequence diverged) (Figure 2B). Two of these "modules" are represented by known protein-protein interaction motifs; a BTB (broad complex, tramtrack, bric à brac)/POZ (pox virus and zinc finger) domain (Albagli et al., 1995; Aravind and Koonin, 1999) in the amino-terminal region, and a coiled-coil domain (Cohen and Parry, 1996; Lupas, 1996) in the carboxyl-terminal region (Motchoulski and Liscum, 1999; Sakai et al., 2000; E. Liscum, unpublished). While no particular function can be inferred from the mere presence of a BTB/POZ or a coiled-coil domain, the fact that most of the NPH3/RPT2 family members contain one or both—21 of 32 members, including NPH3 and RPT2, contain both, while only two contain neither (E. Liscum, unpublished)—suggests that protein-protein interactions are an important feature of the biochemical function of this family.
NPH3, like phot1 (Briggs and Huala, 1999), has been shown to be associated with the plasmalemma (Motchoulski and Liscum, 1999). This property, along with the fact that NPH3 contains multiple potential phosphorylation sites, suggested that NPH3 might be a substrate for phot1's kinase activity. NPH3 does appear to be a phosphoprotein, however it is dephosphorylated, rather than phosphorylated, in response to blue light irradiation (Motchoulski and Liscum, 1999). Moreover, NPH3 seems to be dephosphorylated in etiolated phot1 null mutant seedlings, indicating that the protein phosphatase that dephosphorylates NPH3 in wild-type seedlings is not directly regulated by light or phot1 (Motchoulski and Liscum, 1999). Thus it appears that NPH3 is not a substrate for phot1's kinase domain.
One interpretation of the aforementioned results is that phot1 normally interacts with NPH3 in etiolated seedlings, thus "protecting" NPH3 from protein phosphatase action. Blue light-dependent changes in phot1, such as autophosphorylation (Christie et al., 1998, 1999), might disrupt this interaction, exposing sites on NPH3 for dephosphorylation. Yeast two-hybrid and in vitro co-immunoprecipitation studies have demonstrated that carboxyl-terminal coiled-coil-containing portions of NPH3 interact with amino-terminal LOV-domain-containing portions of phot1, consistent with the proposal that phot1 and NPH3 are components of a signaling complex (Motchoulski and Liscum, 1999). It is worth mentioning in the context of the model outlined above, that the phot1-NPH3 interaction in yeast is much stronger in darkness than in blue light (A. Motchoulski and E. Liscum, unpublished). These findings suggest, as introduced earlier, that phototropic "sensitivity" in low fluence rate blue light conditions may be regulated in part by the integrity of an NPH3-phot1 complex. In other words phototropic desensitization may occur through complex dissociation upon blue light-induced phot1 autophosphorylation.
NPH3 has been proposed to act as a modular scaffold bringing phot1 together with early acting proteins (e.g., protein kinases or phosphatases) whose activities are modulated by phot1 to transduce the low fluence rate phototropic signals (Motchoulski and Liscum, 1999; Liscum and Stowe-Evans, 2000). Based on its mutant phenotypes and homology to NPH3, RPT2 is proposed to scaffold phot2 and associated early signaling proteins in a situation analogous to that proposed for NPH3 and phot1 (Liscum, 2002). The assembly of multi-molecular complexes on protein scaffolds has emerged as a common mechanism of optimizing speed, specificity, and selectivity of signaling in fungi and animals (Elion, 1998; Faux and Scott, 1996; Tsunoda et al., 1998; Sim and Scott, 1999; Fisher et al., 1999). One of the "pioneer" scaffold proteins is Ste5 (Sterile5) of S. cerevisae, which is involved in mating-pheromone sensing and response. Ste5 scaffolds a functional signaling complex that includes the G-protein pheromone sensor (via the Gβ subunit, Ste4), a sensor-activated protein kinase (Ste20), and a signal amplifying MAP kinase cascade (MAPKKK, Ste11; MAPKK, Ste7; MAPK, Fus3) (Faux and Scott, 1996; Pawson and Scott, 1997). Despite being divergent in both sequence and structure, scaffold proteins are able to assemble signaling complexes via presence of multiple protein-protein interaction domains, or modules (Faux and Scott, 1996; Newton, 1996; Pawson and Scott, 1997; Tsunoda et al., 1998).
NPH3 and RPT2 are certainly modular in nature and contain two known protein-protein interaction domains: a BTB/POZ domain and a coiled-coil (Motchoulski and Liscum, 1999; Sakai et al., 2000). Scaffold proteins have also most frequently been found associated with complexes that utilize protein kinases and phosphatases as signal carriers (Faux and Scott, 1996; Pawson and Scott, 1997; Sim and Scott, 1999). The experimental demonstration that NPH3 interacts with phot1 (Motchoulski and Liscum, 1999) and likelihood that RPT2 interacts with phot2 (Liscum, 2002), are compelling since the phototropins are both sensors and protein kinases (Christie et al., 1998, 1999). Correct or incorrect, the scaffold model provides the impetus for several experimentally addressable questions.
Differential auxin localization
Most mechanistic models of tropic growth responses, including phototropism, have auxin as a linchpin that holds pieces of the model together (Estelle, 1996; Chen et al., 1999; Liscum and Stowe-Evans, 2000). Nearly all such models are based in large part on the Cholodny-Went theory which holds that tropic stimuli induce differential lateral auxin transport that leads to the unequal distribution of auxin, and hence growth, in the two sides of a curving organ (Went and Thimann, 1937). While lateral auxin transport, or accumulation, has proven remarkably difficult to demonstrate in many systems (Trewavas et al., 1992), studies of a number of Arabidopsis mutants have clearly demonstrated that the transport of, and response to, auxin is prerequisite for the development of tropic curvatures (Estelle, 1996; Leyser, 1998; Chen et al., 1999; Palme and Gälweiler, 1999; Rosen et al., 1999; Liscum and Stowe-Evans, 2000; Liscum, 2002; Friml and Palme, 2002). Most recently Friml and colleagues (2002) have shown that a member of the PIN family of putative polar auxin efflux carriers, PIN3, is localized to the lateral face of endodermal cells in hypocotyls and non-functional alleles carrying transposon insertions reduce the phototropic response of the seedling stem.
Several studies have shown that auxin efflux processes, which are necessary for the establishment of a lateral gradient of auxin (Lomax et al., 1995; Friml et al., 2002), may be regulated via reversible protein phosphorylation (Bernasconi, 1996; Garbers et al., 1996; Delbarre et al., 1998; Christensen et al., 2000; Rashotte et al., 2001; DeLong et al., 2002). These findings provide a compelling potential connection between the phototropins, which are light-activated protein kinases (Christie et al., 1998; Sakai et al., 2001), and the differential auxin gradients that have been observed in seedlings irradiated with unilateral blue light (Iino, 1990). A number of possible biochemical pathways from phototropin activation to changes in auxin transport can be postulated, including direct phosphorylation of an auxin efflux carrier by phototropins, and phototropin-dependent modulation of auxin transporter localization (Liscum, 2002). Determining exactly how phototropin activation leads to changes in auxin transportor activity/localization is likely to be one of the most active areas of phototropic research over the next few years.
Auxin-dependent changes in gene expression
What happens after a lateral auxin gradient is formed across the phototropically stimulated stem? At least one of the consequences appears to be a change in gene expression (Harper et al., 2000; Liscum and Stowe-Evans, 2000; Liscum and Reed, 2002). This conclusion is based mainly on analyses of the NPH4/MSG1/TIR5 locus (hereafter referred to as NPH4) of Arabidopsis. First, mutations in the NPH4 locus cause reduced phototropic and gravitropic responses in seedling stems (Liscum and Briggs, 1996; Watahiki and Yamamoto, 1997; Watahiki et al., 1999), as well as severely impaired auxin-induced stem bending (Watahiki and Yamamoto, 1997), stem growth inhibition (Watahiki and Yamamoto, 1997; Stowe-Evans et al., 1998), and gene expression responses (Stowe-Evans et al., 1998). Second, map-based cloning of the NPH4 gene has revealed that it encodes the auxin-responsive transcriptional activator ARF7 (Harper et al., 2000), consistent with impaired auxin-induced gene expression profiles observed in the nph4/arf7 mutants (Stowe-Evans et al., 1998). Unfortunately, to date, specific targets of NPH4/ARF7 that are necessary for the establishment of phototropic responses have not been identified. However, with functional genomics tools now at our disposal, targets for NPH4/ARF7 regulation should not remain elusive for long.
Conclusions
In recent years, tremendous advances have been made in our understanding of the molecular bases for the long-studied phototropic responses of plants. Photoreceptor molecules, the phototropins, capable of perceiving directional UV-A/blue light cues have been identified and characterized. With their identification came the end of a long debate over the molecular identity of the chromophoric unit of the phototropic receptor(s). Moreover, the finding that phototropins are light-activated protein kinases provides impetus for development of several mechanistic models of phototropic signal transduction that are eminently testable with current tools and methodologies. At least two proteins acting early in the phototropin signaling pathways have also been identified, namely NPH3 and RPT2. Both proteins are members of a novel plant-specific protein family and have been hypothesized to function as scaffold proteins to bring the phototropins together with downstream signaling elements. The physical interaction demonstrated between phot1 and NPH3 is certainly consistent with this model.
Finally, the importance of auxins in the phototropic response has been clearly demonstrated through a number of genetic studies, primarily auxin transport and auxin-dependent gene expression. If the last ten years are any indication, the next decade should be an exciting one for those studying phototropism. While the final painting of the molecular basis of phototropism is far from complete, several talented 'artists' are transforming the once blank canvas into something with recognizable form that will eventually be considered a classic piece of human endeavor.
Acknowledgments
Recent studies on phototropism in the Liscum laboratory were supported by National Science Foundation grants no. MCB-0077312 and IBN-0114992 and USDA National Research Initiative grant no. USDA-CSREES 99-35304-8060.
Literature Cited
Albagli, O., Dhordain, P., Deweindt, C., Lecocq, G., and Leprince, D. (1995) The BTB/POZ domain: a new protein-protein interaction motif common to DNA- and actin-binding proteins. Cell Growth Differ. 6, 1193-1198.
The Arabidopsis Genome Initiative (2000) Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature 408, 796-815.
Aravind, L., and Koonin, E. V. (1999) Fold prediction and evolutionary analysis of the POZ domain: structural and evolutionary relationship with the potassium channel tetramerization domain. J. Mol. Biol. 285, 1353–1361.
Ballare, C. L. (1999) Keeping up with the neighbours: phytochrome sensing and other signalling mechanisms. Trends Plant Sci. 4, 97–102.
Baskin, T. I., Iino, M., Green, P. G., and Briggs, W. R. (1985) High-resolution measurements of growth during first positive phototropism in maize. Plant Cell Environ. 8, 595–603.
Bernasconi, P. (1996) Effect of synthetic and natural protein kinase inhibitors on auxin efflux in zucchini (Cucurbita pepo) hypocotyls. Physiol. Plant. 96, 205–210.
Briggs, W. R., and Baskin, T. I. (1988) Phototropism in higher plants--controversies and caveats. Bot. Acta. 101, 133–139.
Briggs, W. R., and Christie, J. M. (2002) Phototropins 1 and 2: Versatile plant blue-light receptors. Trends Plant Sci. 7, 204–210.
Briggs, W. R., and Huala, E. (1999) Blue-light photoreceptors in higher plants. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 15, 33–62.
Briggs, W. R., and Olney, M. A. (2001) Photoreceptors in plant photomorphogenesis to date. Five phytochromes, two cryptochromes, one phototropin, and one superchrome. Plant Physiol. 125, 85–88.
Briggs, W. R., Christie, J. M., and Salomon, M. (2001a) Phototropins: A new family of flavin-binding blue light receptors in plants. Antioxidants Redox Sgnaling 3, 775–788.
Briggs, W. R., Beck, C. F., Cashmore, A. R., Christie, J. M., Hughes, J., Jarillo, J. A., Kagawa, T., Kanegae, H., Liscum, E., Nagatani, A., Okada, K., Salomon, M., Rüdiger, W., Sakai, T., Takano, M., Wada, M., and Watson, J. C. (2001b) The phototropin family of photoreceptors. Plant Cell 13, 993–997.
Chen, R., Rosen, E., and Masson, P. H. (1999) Gravitropism in higher plants. Plant Physiol. 120, 343–350.
Chon, H. P., and Briggs, W. R. (1966) Effect of red light on the phototropic sensitivity of corn coleoptiles. Plant Physiol. 41, 1715–1724.
Christensen, S. K., Dagenais, N., Chory, J., and Weigel, D. (2000) Regulation of auxin response by the protein kinase PINOID. Cell 100, 469–478.
Christie, J. M., and Briggs, W. R. (2001) Blue light sensing in higher plants. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 11457–11460.
Christie, J. M., Reymond, P., Powell, G. P., Bernasconi, P., Raibekas, A. A., Liscum, E., and Briggs, W. R. (1998) Arabidopsis NPH1: a flavoprotein with the properties of the photoreceptor for phototropism. Science 282, 1698–1701.
Christie, J. M., Salomon, M., Nozue, K., Wada, M., and Briggs, W. R. (1999) LOV (light, oxygen, or voltage) domains of the blue-light photoreceptor phototropin (nph1): binding sites for the chromophore flavin mononucleotide. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96, 8779–8783.
Cohen, C., and Parry, D. A. D. (1996) α-Helical coiled coils and bundles: how to design an α-helical protein. Proteins 7, 1–15.
Crosson, S., and Moffat, K. (2001) Structure of a flavin-binding plant photoreceptor domain: Insights into light-mediated signal transduction. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 2995–3000.
Crosson, S., and Moffat, K. (2002) Photoexcited structure of a plant photorecepto domain reveals a light-driven molecular switch. Plant Cell 14, 1–9.
Darwin, C. (1880) Power of Movement in Plants (John Murray: London).
Delbarre, A., Muller, P., and Guern, J. (1998) Short-lived and phsophorylated proteins contribute to carrier-mediated efflux, but not to influx, of auxin in suspension-cultured tobacco cells. Plant Physiol. 116, 833–844.
DeLong, A., Mockaitis, K., and Christensen, S. (2002) Protein phosphorylation in the delivery of and response to auxin signals. Plant Mol. Biol. 49, 285–303.
Elion, E. A. (1998) Routing MAP kinase cascades. Science 281, 1625–1626.
Estelle, M. (1996) Plant tropisms: the ins and outs of auxin. Curr. Biol. 6, 1589–1591.
Fankhauser, C., and Chory, J. (1998) Photomorphogenesis: light receptor kinases in plants! Curr. Biol. 9, R123–R126.
Faux, M. C., and Scott, J. D. (1996) Molecular glue: kinase anchoring and scaffold proteins. Cell 85, 9–12.
Fisher, M. J., Paton, R. C., and Matsuno, K. (1999) Intracellular signalling proteins as "smart" agents on parallel-distributed processes. Biosystems 50, 159–171.
Friml, J., and Palme, K. (2002) Polar auxin transport - old questions and new concepts? Plant Mol. Biol. 49, 273–284.
Friml, J., Wisniewska, J., Benkova, E., Mendgen, K., and Palme, K. (2002) Lateral relocaliztion of auxin efflux regulator PIN3 mediates tropism in Arabidopsis. Nature 415, 806–809.
Gallagher, S., Short, T. W., Pratt, L. H., Ray, P. M., and Briggs, W. R. (1988) Light-induced changes in two proteins found associated with plasma membrane fractions from pea stem sections. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85, 8003–8007.
Galland, P. (1989) Photosensory adaptation in plants. Bot. Acta 102, 11–20.
Galland, P. (1991) Photosensory adaptation in aneural organisms. Photochem. Photobiol. 54, 1119–1134.
Garbers, C., DeLong, A., Deruère, J., Bernasconi, P., and Soil, D. (1996) A mutation in protein phosphatase 2A regulatory subunit A affects auxin transport in Arabidopsis. EMBO J. 15, 2115–2124.
Harmer, S. L., Hogenesch, J. B., Straume, M., Chang, H.-S., Han, B., Zhu, T., Wang, X., Kreps, J. A., Kay, S. A. (2000) Orchestrated transcription of key pathways in Arabidopsis by the circadian clock. Science 290, 2110–2113.
Harper, R. M., Stowe-Evans, E. L., Luesse, D. R., Muto, H., Tatematsu, K., Watahiki, M. K., Yamamoto, K., and Liscum, E. (2000) The NPH4 locus encodes the auxin response factor ARF7, a conditional regulator of differential growth in aerial Arabidopsis tissue. Plant Cell 12, 757–770.
Hart, J. W. (1988) Light and Plant Growth (Unwin Hyman: London).
Huala, E., Oeller, P. W., Liscum, E., Han, I.-S., Larsen, E., and Briggs, W. R. (1997) Arabidopsis NPH1: a protein kinase with a putative redox-sensing domain. Science 278, 2120–2123.
Iino, M. (1990) Phototropism: mechanisms and ecological implications. Plant Cell Environ. 13, 633–650.
Janoudi, A.-K., and Poff, K. L. (1991) Characterization of adaptation in phototropism of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Physiol. 95, 517–521.
Janoudi, A.-K., and Poff, K. L. (1993) Desensitization and recovery of phototropic responsiveness in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Physiol. 101, 1175–1180.
Jarillo, J. A., Ahmad, M., and Cashmore, A. R. (1998) NPL1: a second member of the NPH1 serine/threonine kinase family of Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 117, 719.
Jarillo, J. A., Gabrys, H., Capel, J., Alonso, J. M., Ecker, J. R., and Cashmore, A. R. (2001) Phototropin-related NPL1 controls chloroplast relocalization induced by blue light. Nature 410, 952–954.
Jensen, P. J., Hangarter, R. P., and Estelle, M. (1998) Auxin transport is required for hypocotyl elongation in light-grown but not dark-grown Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 116, 455–462.
Kasahara, M., Swartz, T. E., Olney, M. A., Onodera, A., Mochizuki, N., Fukuzawa, H., Asamizu, E., Tabata, S., Kanegae, H., Takano, M., Christie, J. M., Nagatani, A., and Briggs, W. R. (2002) Photochemical properties of the flavin mononucleotide-binding domains of the phototropins from Arabidopsis, rice and Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Plant Physiol. 129, 762–773.
Khurana, J. P., and Poff, K. L. (1989) Mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana with altered phototropism. Planta 178, 400–406.
Koller, D. (1990) Light-driven leaf movements. Plant Cell Environ. 13, 615–632.
Konjevic, R., Khurana, J. P., and Poff, K. L. (1992) Analysis of multiple photoreceptor pigments for phototropism in a mutant of Arabidopsis thaliana. Photochem. Photobiol. 55, 789–792.
Leyser, O. (1998) Auxin: lessons from a mutant weed. Physiol. Plant. 100, 407–414.
Liscum, E. (2002). Phototropism: Mechanisms and outcomes. In The Arabidopsis Book, C. R. Somerville and E. M. Meyerowitz, eds. (American Society of Plant Biologists) doi/10.1199/tab.0042, www.aspb.org/publications/Arabidopsis.
Liscum, E., and Briggs, W. R. (1995) Mutations in the NPH1 locus of Arabidopsis disrupt the perception of phototropic stimuli. Plant Cell 7, 473–485.
Liscum, E., and Briggs, W. R. (1996) Mutations of Arabidopsis in potential transduction and response components of the phototropic signaling pathway. Plant Physiol. 112, 291–296.
Liscum, E., and Stowe-Evans, E. L. (2000) Phototropism: A "simple" physiological response modulated by multiple interacting photosensory-response pathways. Photochem. Photobiol. 72, 273–282.
Liscum, E., and Reed, J. W. (2002) Genetics of Aux/IAA and ARF action in plant growth and development. Plant Mol. Biol. 49, 387–400.
Lomax, T. L., Muday, G. K., and Rubery, P. H. (1995) Auxin transport. In Plant Hormones, P. J. Davies, ed (Kluwer Academic Press: Dordrecht, The Netherlands), pp. 509–530.
Lupas, A. (1996) Coiled coils: new structures and new functions. Trends Biochem. Sci. 21, 375–382.
McClung, C. R. (2001) Circadian rhythms in plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 52, 139–162.
Motchoulski, A., and Liscum, E. (1999) Arabidopsis NPH3: a NPH1 photoreceptor-interacting protein essential for phototropism. Science 286, 961–964.
Newton, A. C. (1996) Protein kinase C: ports of anchor in the cell. Curr. Biol. 6, 806–809.
Okada, K., and Shimura, Y. (1992) Mutational analysis of root gravitropism and phototropism of Arabidopsis thaliana seedlings. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 19, 439–448.
Orbovic, V., and Poff, K. L. (1993) Growth Distribution during phototropism of Arabidopsis thaliana seedlings. Plant Physiol. 103, 157–163.
Palme, K., and Gälweiler, L. (1999) PIN-pointing the molecular basis of auxin transport. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2, 375–381
Palmer, J. M., Short, T. W., and Briggs, W. R. (1993) Correlation of blue-light-induced phosphorylation to phototropism in Zea mays L. Plant Physiol. 102, 1219–1225.
Patschinsky, T., Hunter, T., Esch, F. S., Cooper, J. A., and Sefton, B. M. (1982) Analysis of the sequence of amino acids surrounding sites of tyrosine phosphorylation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 79, 973–977.
Patton, E. E., Willems, A. R., and Tyers, M. (1998) Combinatorial control in ubiquitin-dependent proteolysis: don't skip the F-box hypothesis. Trends Genet. 14, 236–243.
Pawson, T., and Scott, J. D. (1997) Signaling through scaffold, anchoring, and adapter proteins. Science 278, 2075–2080.
Rashotte, A. M., DeLong, A., and Muday, G. K. (2001) Genetic and chemical reductions in protein phosphatase activity alter auxin transport, gravity responses, and lateral root growth. Plant Cell 13, 1683–1697.
Reymond, P., Short, T. W., Briggs, W. R., and Poff, K. L. (1992) Light-induced phosphorylation of a membrane protein plays an early role in signal transduction for phototropism in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89, 4718–4721.
Rosen, E., Chen, R., and Masson, P. H. (1999) Root gravitropism: a complex response to a simple stimulus? Trends Plant Sci. 4, 407–412.
Sachs (von), J. (1887) Lectures on the Physiology of Plants (Clarendon: Oxford).
Sakai, T., Wada, T., Ishiguro, S., and Okada, K. (2000) RPT2: a signal tranducer of the phototropic response in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 12, 225–236.
Sakai, T., Kagawa, T., Kasahara, M., Swartz, T. E., Christie, J. M., Briggs, W. R., Wada, M., and Okada, K. (2001) Arabidopsis nph1 and npl1: Blue light receptors that mediate both phototropism and chloroplast relocalization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 6969–6974.
Salomon, M., Zacherl, M., and Rüdiger, W. (1997) Asymmetric, blue light-dependent phosphorylation of a 116-kilodalton plasma membrane protein can be correlated with first- and second-positive phototropic curvature of oat coleoptiles. Plant Physiol. 115, 485–491.
Salomon, M., Christie, J. M., Kneib, E., Lempert. U., and Briggs, W. R. (2000) Photochemical and mutational analysis of the FMN-binding domain of the plant blue light photoreceptor, phototropin. Biochemistry 39, 9401–9410.
Salomon, M., Eisenreich, W., Dürr, H., Schleicher, E., Kneib, E., Massey, V., Rüdiger, W., Müller, F., Bacher, A., and Richter, G. (2001) An optomechanical transducer in the blue light receptor phototropin from Avena sativa. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 12357–12361.
Satter, R. L., and Galston, A. W. (1981) Mechanisms of control of leaf movements. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 32, 83–110.
Short, T. W., and Briggs, W. R. (1994) The transduction of blue light signals in higher plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 45, 143–171.
Sim, A. T. R., and Scott, J. D. (1999) Targeting PKA, PKC and protein phosphatases to cellular microdomains. Cell Calcium 26, 209–217.
Stowe-Evans, E. L., Harper, R. M., Motchoulski, A. V., and Liscum, E. (1998) NPH4, a conditional modulator of auxin-dependent differential growth responses in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 118, 1265–1275.
Swartz, T. E., Corchnoy, S. B., Christie, J. M., Lewis, J. W., Szundi, I., Briggs, W. R., and Bogomolni, R. A. (2001) The photocycle of a flavin-binding domain of the blue light photoreceptor phototropin. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 36493–36500.
Swartz, T. E., Wenzel, P. J., Corchnoy, S. B., Briggs, W. R., and Bogomolni, R. A. (2002) Vibration spectroscopy reveals light-induced chromophore and protein structural changes in the LOV2 domains of the plant blue-light receptor phototropin 1. Biochemistry 41, 7183–7189.
Taylor, B. L., and Zhulin, I. B. (1999) PAS domains: internal sensors of oxygen, redox potential, and light. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 63, 479–506.
Trewavas, T., Briggs, W. R., Bruinsma, J., Evans, M. L., Firn, R., Hertel, R., Iino, M., Jones, A. M., Leopold, A. C., Pilet, P. E., Poff, K. L., Roux, S. J., Salibury, F. B., Scott, T. K., Sievers, A., Zieschang, H. E., and Wayne, R. (1992) Forum: What remains of the Cholodny-Went theory? Plant Cell Environ. 15, 759–794.
Tsunoda, S., Sierralta, J., and Zuker, C. S. (1998) Specificity in signaling pathways: assembly into multimolecular signaling complexes. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 8, 419–422.
Watahiki, M. K., and Yamamoto, K. T. (1997) The massugu1 mutation of Arabidopsis identified with failure of auxin-induced growth curvature of hypocotyl confers auxin insensitivity to hypocotyl and leaf. Plant Physiol. 115, 419–426.
Watahiki, M. K., Tatematsu, K., Fujihira, K., Yamamoto, M., and Yamamoto, K. T. (1999) The MSG1 and AXR1 genes of Arabidopsis are likely to act independently in growth-curvature responses of hypocotyl. Planta 207, 362–369.
Went, F. W., and Thimann, K. V. (1937) Phytohormones (Macmillan: New York).
Zimmermann, S., Ehrhardt, T., Plesch, G., and Müller-Röber, B. (1999) Ion channels in plant signaling. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 55, 183–203
Zhulin, I. B., and Taylor, B. L. (1997) PAS domain S-boxes in Archaea, bacteria and sensors for oxygen and redox. Trends Biochem. Sci. 22, 331–333.
HOME :: CHAPTER 19 :: Essay 19.3 |
PREVIOUS :: NEXT |